Polish in Lithuania

Speakers

183,000

Type

Location

Country

Information available

1. Basics

Names

Polish in Lithuania

Size

183,000

2. Status

Status

  • Official country wide language
  • Official regional language
  • Official minority language
  • Recognised community language
  • Unrecognised community language
National language
No
Indigenous language
No
Administrative units of the country
districts of Šalčininkai, Vilnius, Trakai, Švenčionys

3. State

Documentation: materials

Written

  • Extended corpora
  • Annotated corpora
  • Corpus/corpora
  • Materials/corpus
  • Some materials
  • No materials
Digital
Yes

divider

Video

  • Extended corpora
  • Annotated corpora
  • Corpus/corpora
  • Materials/corpus
  • Some materials
  • No materials
Digital
Yes

divider

Audio

  • Extended corpora
  • Annotated corpora
  • Corpus/corpora
  • Materials/corpus
  • Some materials
  • No materials
Digital
Yes

divider

Documentation: descriptions

  • Elaborated dictionaries, grammars, statistical language models, etc.
  • Dictionaries and grammars
  • Dictionary and grammar
  • Glossary and descriptions
  • Few descriptions
  • No descriptions
Digital
Yes

Standardization

  • Modern standard language
  • Young standard language
  • Standardised language
  • Quasi-standard language
  • Semi-standardised language
  • Un-standardised language

Graphisation & script encoding

  • Standardised writing system with full script encoding
  • Conventionalised writing system with partial script encoding
  • Consistent writing system with no script encoding
  • Unsystematic writing system(s)
  • Limited written use
  • No written use

4. Users

Geographical distribution

  • Users live and dominate in all regions of the country
  • Users live in one [state/...] of the country
  • Users live in a cross-border region [state/...] of the country
  • Users live in separated [states/...] of the country
  • Users live dispersed across one [state/...] of the country
  • Users live scattered all over the country

Settlements

  • Rural
  • Urban
Administrative units of the country
districts of Šalčininkai, Vilnius, Trakai, Švenčionys

Size / Number of users

Number of users

183000
Source
Population Census
Year
2021

Users within total population

6.50000
Less than 10% use the language

PROPORTION

Actual percentage
7
Source
Population Census
Year
2021

Users within the reference community

More than 50% use the language
Actual percentage
73
Source
Population census
Year
2021
Comments
Poles who consider Polish as their mother tongue

Age distribution of users

22,805
12
percentage of members of young generations (< 15)
Source

Population census

Year
2021

Age distribution of users

122,719
67
percentage of members of middle generations (15-65)
Source

Population census

Year
2021

Age distribution of users

37,892
21
percentage of members of older generations (> 65)
Source

Population census

Year
2021

Generational use

50
50
134,634
All generations

Educational attainment

No education
2
2
2,731
Early childhood education
Source

Population census

Year
2021
11
10
17,458
Primary education
17
15
24,692
Lower secondary education
56
53
91,903
Higher secondary education
15
22
32,029
Tertiary education

Occupational qualifications

39
61
14,087
Elementary occupations
Source

Population census

Year
2021
83
17
10,168
Plant and machine operators and assemblers
Source

Population census

Year
2021
77
23
12,867
Craft and related trades workers
Source

Population census

Year
2021
52
48
1,857
Skilled agricultural, forestry and fishery workers
Source

Population census

Year
2021
22
78
3,242
Services and sales workers
Source

Population census

Year
2021
30
70
4,610
Clerical support workers
Source

Population census

Year
2021
44
56
6,289
Technicians and associate professionals
Source

Population census

Year
2021
26
74
16,885
Professionals
Source

Population census

Year
2021
58
43
6,135
Managers
Source

Population census

Year
2021

Language competence

100
100
134,634
Understand all, speak/sign well

Literacy of users

100
100
(Almost) 100 % of users with literacy in the language
Actual percentage
100

Digital use

87
87
More than 50% digital users of the language
Actual percentage
87
Source

Information Society Development Committee

Comments

Data aggregated for Lithuania as a whole, not detailed by nationality

5. Use

Socio-geographic dimension

Geographic scope
  • International
  • Supranational
  • Cross-border (states)
  • State-wide
  • Supra-regional cross-border
  • Supra-regional
  • Regional cross-border
  • Regional
  • Local
Source
districts of Šalčininkai, Vilnius, Trakai, Švenčionys

Economic dimension

Functional dimension

Functional scope
  • Public domains
  • Everyday domains
  • Private domains
Nature
complementary
Functional scope
  • Public domains
  • Everyday domains
  • Private domains
Nature
equal
Functional scope
  • Public domains
  • Everyday domains
  • Private domains
Nature
equal

Functional use in administration

Language use in administration
  • International level
  • National level
  • Regional level
  • Local level
  • Auxiliary use
  • No use

Types of language use

  • signed / spoken use
  • written use
  • digital use
Comments
Administration of complaints and requests in municipalities. Participation of an interpreter in court proceedings

Ethnoculture

Formal Education

Early childhood education
Type of language use in education
  • Medium of instruction
  • Immersion teaching
  • Teaching subject
  • Occasionally used
  • Symbolically used
Primary level
Type of language use in education
  • Medium of instruction
  • Immersion teaching
  • Teaching subject
  • Occasionally used
  • Symbolically used
Lower secondary level
Type of language use in education
  • Medium of instruction
  • Immersion teaching
  • Teaching subject
  • Occasionally used
  • Symbolically used
Higher secondary level
Type of language use in education
  • Medium of instruction
  • Immersion teaching
  • Teaching subject
  • Occasionally used
  • Symbolically used
Tertiary level
Type of language use in education
  • Medium of instruction
  • Immersion teaching
  • Teaching subject
  • Occasionally used
  • Symbolically used

Public healthcare

Information, communication and cultural production

Digital sphere

Completion